When to Use Mitigate
You might recall I mentioned that during any time of crisis, the not-so-often-heard words come out of the woodwork. We discussed the prevalence of proximity or should I say the misuse of close proximity earlier, but it’s long past time to delve into when to use mitigate and mitigation.
Nowadays it seems as if you can’t read an article without seeing mitigate or mitigation numerous times, and you certainly can’t listen to any experts or analysts on TV without being bombarded with the words.
I shouldn’t complain because in most cases, they use it properly, but the improper part might be that they use it so much (or even at all).
These briefings from analysts and experts are meant for normal, everyday people. As such you’d think they would adapt their speech to accommodate it, not try to use words a lot of people may not understand.
And before you say “mitigate isn’t bad,” remember that it may not be difficult for you to understand, but for millions of others it is. And the hard, cold facts are that everyone is equally susceptible to the virus, not just the educated, so everyone needs to be informed.
So let’s look at mitigate and see what it really means.
Merriam Webster’s has this to say:
to make (something) less severe, violent, cruel, intense, or painful: soften, alleviate
They had an example sentence that seemed appropriate for what’s going on now.
medicines used to mitigate a patient’s suffering.
But could we have expressed that better? I think “medicines used to ease a patient’s suffering” or “medicines used to lessen a patient’s suffering” would have worked as well, if not better. They mean the same thing and would have been understood by more people.
I have a huge problem with dictionaries (and grammar books/style guides, etc.). They seem to go to great lengths to confuse people, make it as difficult to understand as possible, but that’s for another post. For now, let’s look at another definition.
Chamber’s Dictionary
To mollify, appease
To make more easily borne
To lessen the severity, violence or evil of
To temper
The above definitions are all fine, but then again, they could all have been made simpler. We didn’t need mollify. And “to make more easily borne” could have been “to make easier to bear.” I think you see the point.
Last night, my wife was watching TV while I typed on the iPad, and after hearing mitigate and mitigation used so often, I began to count. During the next hour, I heard a form of the word used fourteen times by four people. When I did a search of the usage using Google’s Ngram tool, I was surprised to see it was used much more often decades ago, peaking in the early 1800s, hitting a low point during WWII, then rising to almost its previous high in 2000.
But Do We Need Mitigate?
The bottom line is “no” we don’t. There are plenty of ways to say what you mean using words that are far easier for people to understand, and that is the goal of communicating—to convey a point to another person.When I listen to some people speak and read some books, it seems as if their goal is to show off their vocabulary.
Bottom Line
To me, a good vocabulary should be used to let the person speaking/writing know which words they don’t have to use.
If you enjoyed this post, please share.
Giacomo Giammatteo is the author of gritty crime dramas about murder, mystery, and family. And he also writes nonfiction books, including Simply Put: The Plain English Grammar Guide and the No Mistakes Careers series as well as other books on grammar, fantasy, publishing, writing, and children’s fiction and nonfiction.
When Giacomo isn’t writing, he’s helping his wife take care of the animals on their sanctuary. At last count, they had forty animals—seven dogs, one horse, six cats, and twenty-five pigs.
Oh, and one crazy—and very large—wild boar, who used to take walks with Giacomo every day.
He lives in Texas, where he and his wife have an animal sanctuary with forty loving “friends.”
Connect
Connect with us on the following social media platforms.